Professional services · roll-up acquisition

A regional CPA firm where goodwill was the entire transaction — restaged for the buyer who priced it.

When the practice is the brand, a generic logo and a 2014 website ask the acquirer to discount the only thing they're buying. We didn't let them.

Sector
CPA firmMidwest US, 2 partners
Revenue
$1.8M~62% recurring
Timeline
8 wksKickoff to close-ready
Lift over estimate
+14%Above broker's pre-engagement number

The situation

A two-partner accounting firm in a mid-sized Midwestern metro. $1.8M in revenue, roughly 62% recurring across monthly bookkeeping retainers and annual tax compliance work for ~340 small-business clients. Both partners were inside five years of retirement and wanted out together. The broker — a CEPA-affiliated specialist in accounting practice sales — had three regional roll-ups on the short list.

The visible brand assets had been built piecemeal over fifteen years. The logo was a stock business-services mark with the firm's name in Times New Roman. The website was three pages on Wix, last updated when the second partner joined in 2018. The client newsletter went out in plain-text email. There was no sales deck — the partners had never needed one because they'd never marketed for clients.

The broker's pre-engagement valuation came in at 0.85× annual revenue, the floor for the regional comp. Roll-ups in this category are explicit about pricing brand strength because they consolidate firms regularly and know exactly what hurts post-acquisition retention.

For services firms, the brand is the goodwill being sold. A generic identity and an absent web presence said "you'll need to introduce yourselves to these clients again." That's a discount you can't argue with a spreadsheet.

What we shipped

One Showroom engagement, eight weeks, productized scope. The partners had three diligence calls already on the calendar in weeks 6, 9, and 11 — the work was sequenced so every meeting after week 6 referenced the upgraded asset.

How the offer moved

The website went live in week 6, two days before the third diligence call. That call was the one where the lead bidder's M&A partner first used the phrase "specialty practice" to describe the firm — a phrase no one on the deal team had used before. The next written offer raised the multiple to 1.05× and added a longer earn-out tail tied to retention, which the partners accepted.

0.85×Broker's pre-engagement estimate (revenue multiple)
1.05×Final accepted offer (revenue multiple)
$252KAdditional sale proceeds vs. the pre-engagement estimate

The reframe that did the most

Of every deliverable, the highest-leverage one was the category reframe from "general accounting" to "specialty practice for manufacturing and trades." It cost almost nothing — the work was already specialized; we just named it. But that single positioning move moved the comp set, which moved the multiple.

The website, the deck, the new identity — all of it pointed back to that one reframe. Acquirers buy specialty practices on different math than they buy general practices. The math did the rest.

Where the credit belongs

The recurring revenue and client retention numbers were already there. The partners had done the hard work of building a sticky practice. What we did: gave acquirers a vocabulary and a visible asset set that matched what they were already paying for in the comp data. The discount disappeared because the buyer stopped seeing the practice as a generic-CPA target.

Composite engagement, assembled from real Brand2Sell client work. Region, revenue, multiple, and identifying detail have been altered to honor NDA. The pattern — specialty-practice reframe, mid-engagement website launch, multiple moved by the recategorization rather than by the design work alone — is consistent across the underlying engagements.

Book the discovery call   See the other case studies